Average annual spending on mobile phones, domestic and international fixed services, 2001-2010
The line graphs below depicts the average amount of money on cell phone services, international fixed-line services and national fixed-line services in the period in the USA from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, 2 out of 3 line has significant changes. Cell phone services increased enormously, international fixed-line services oscillated slightly and national fixed-line services was opposite with increased of line 1.
As can be seen from the line graph, the money was spend on cell phone services climbed continuously. Back in 2001, this line started at only 200 dollars annually. It is a very little number in that year. Over the following 5 years, the figure of people who spent money on cell phone services grew double compared with 2001. The most dramatic change is mobile phone reached a peak of over 700 dollars National fixed-line services was different with cell phone. Started at 700 dollars in 2001.But after 5 years, the average amount of expenditure on national landline services reduced slightly 550 dollars per year. After that, the proportion of people who use this benefit still dropped down continuously at 400 dollars in 2010.
Perhaps international fixed-line services did not have much volatility in the line graphs. In 2001, the figure of this service started with over 250 dollars. Over time, the average money just rose 320 dollars in 2003. At first, it is a good indication for line 2 in the graph. Nevertheless, the quantity declined gradually approximately 300 dollars in span of 6 years from 2004. Although the average expenditure of international fixed-line services did not have much change, the number of money still changed at least against 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | chau hoang | 72 | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of people who visited different museums in London 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
- Average annual spending on mobile phones domestic and international fixed services 2001 2010 72
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...seen from the line graph, the money was spend on cell phone services climbed continuo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...l phone. Started at 700 dollars in 2001.But after 5 years, the average amount of ex...
^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xpenditure on national landline services reduced slightly 550 dollars per year. A...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, still, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16176470588 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79356612204 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503676470588 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0388287342 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.75 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318748315711 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108474694046 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930369587052 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234999632596 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529874606538 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.