The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005.

The given graphs below depict the proportion of car’s owner in Britain between 1975 and 2005.
The initial impression is 3 out of 4 lines has tends to increase or no decrease. The opposite was true for people who do not own car in this country. 2 cars and 3 or more cars increased minimally, 1 car decreased slightly and 0 cars declined significantly over the period shown.
In 1975, people who have 2, 3 or more cars was the quite similar proportion at only 7,5% and under 5% respectively. Over time, the figure people owning 2 cars rose to some 15% after 20 years. Proprietor 3 cars or more also grown up approximately above 5% in 1995. At the end of the period on the line graphs, those line all expanded about 17,5% and 7,5% alternately.
In 1975, nearly half British people has 1 car in their house at around 43%. Almost 30% populations whose have no car in 1975. The owner one car declined at roughly 48% in 1985. But after that, the number of this line improved back at 41% in 2005. While, people who had 0 car dropped down nearly 27% in 2005.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-28 chau hoang 78 view
2023-01-23 Raspreet 78 view
2022-11-08 Wulan 61 view
2022-11-03 Manjinder_kaur 78 view
2022-10-24 nguyen thanh sang 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s has tends to increase or no decrease. The opposite was true for people who do not...
^^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...this line improved back at 41% in 2005. While, people who had 0 car dropped down near...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'car' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cars'.
Suggestion: cars
...at 41% in 2005. While, people who had 0 car dropped down nearly 27% in 2005.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36040609137 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45316877798 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604060913706 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0289244418 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.0769230769 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.1538461538 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.84615384615 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218256791635 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835694210477 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555417349508 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155466921503 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454219629565 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.09 61.2550243902 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.42 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.