The information about owners of car in the England in 4 different types is illustrated by the given line chart. The year under consideration between 1975 and 2005.
Overall, it is crystal clear that owners of car were declined in the UK while other owning car were increased in entire period. Where one car owners were record at peak and three car owners were at bottom.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen from chart that in 1975, owning one car in London was registered the highest marks that accounted about 45%. It was followed by no car owner, having preposition about 43%. However, 8% was recorded in case of 2 car owner while 3 car owner were negligible.
Moving further, after a decade one car owners were slightly decreased about 38%. In following year it conterminously move upward and reach at same position in 2005. No car owner were rapidly decreased up to 1985. After that it declined slowly and it was at 23% in last year. Ownership of 3 or 2 cars were moved parallel in upward which recorded about 20% and 10% in 2005, respectively.
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period
- 1 In the last century when a human astronaut first arrived on the Moon he said it is a big step for mankind but some people think it makes little difference to our daily life To what extent to you agree or disagree 73
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage of our natural environment What are the causes and solutions 73
- Writing task 1 The Car Ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'moves'?
Suggestion: moves
...8%. In following year it conterminously move upward and reach at same position in 20...
^^^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or 2 cars were moved parallel in upward which recorded about 20% and 10% in 2005...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58421052632 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52875430557 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7733651069 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5833333333 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.08333333333 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219079355582 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920703790475 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506008343838 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143060348167 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107186045937 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.