The bar graph provides the information about the funds spend on various form of entertainment by individuals of three nations. The year under consideration between 1995 and 2000.
Overall, it is crystal clear that America invest maximum amount of money in world entertainment markets over a five period time as compared to Asia and Europe.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen that in 1995, United States spent on five different forms of fun was registered the highest value that accounted about 184 billion people. It was followed by Europe, having proportion of 97 billion. 67 were recorded in the case of Asian public. However, people from three nations in 1995 spent most of money on publishing and television was maximum in 2000. Whereas, they show less interest in music, video and cinema.
Moving further, in 2000, number of individuals slight raise in all nation those spend funds for entertainment. In America, people were increased about 257 while gap of 35 billion European can seen. Individual from Asia were inclined by 110 billion.
- The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage of our natural environment What are the causes and solutions 73
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period 78
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period
- Adults always say that life is better in childhood and classroom than now Why they think so Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64574514021 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9249144004 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1818181818 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241335660598 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691418513487 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664679104629 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132122459228 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792345562456 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.