The charts below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005
The line graphs above representate the UK’s people who have the car in the last thirty years exactly from 1975 to 2005. It is explained in million people.
Overall, people who have two cars increased steadily in every year for thirty years. Instead, people who have no car dropped dramatically in the last thirty years.
According to the data, in 1975 to 1985, the number rose not only in person who have two cars but also person who have three cars though the highly amount merely for two cars, it was around 7 million people beside three cars approximately 2,5 million people. Otherwise, in the initial ten years, the decrease number occured in UK’s people who have no car sharply around 19 million people either people who owned one car dropped about 8 million people.
Then in 1985 to 2005, people who owned two cars and three cars had the same rise amount, about 5 million people while the highly increase happened in person who owned one car, it was approximately 7 million people. Inverse, person who have no car decreased every year, around 4 million people in the last twenty years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Manjinder_kaur | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- The maps below represent the development in the Norbiton in the future 11
- In the future more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday 56
- you have just an article in a national newspaper which claims that town centres in your country all look very similar to each other you don t fully agree with this opinion 70
- In many countries the costs of living are rising What are the effects of this problem on individuals and society suggest solutions to this problem 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...y from 1975 to 2005. It is explained in million people. Overall, people who have two c...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dramatically in the last thirty years. According to the data, in 1975 to 1985, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.734375 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24173225392 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.3480087839 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152643777771 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087651114103 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685552990625 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12643523201 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568628683537 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.