The bar chart below illustrates the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001.
In general, the USA was a country that provided education on top of the chart. Teachers in Japan spend the least amount of time on education in the chart. Spain and Iceland at on average compared to the other countries.
In the USA, teachers in this country spend a lot of time with elementary school students at around 750 hours in a given year. The opposite was true for Japan, which is a country where tutors forked out at least the amount of time on teaching in 3 levels of education at 600, 650, and 700 hours respectively over the period. While at lower secondary in the USA, the number of teaching hours teachers is up to 1000 hours. Nearly 1100 hours were spent in high school students at the USA.
Instructors in Spain typically spent 650 hours in fundamental school in 2001. Under 600 hours of teaching belong to Iceland at the same level. Higher secondary students received almost 750 hours of lectures by a teacher in Spanish. Whereas, educators in Iceland spent the lowest time in secondary school by 600 hours. Finally, the time allocated to teaching upper secondary students by Spanish teachers were 900 hours but the amount of time was less than 910 hours in Iceland.
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 78
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 61
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...damental school in 2001. Under 600 hours of teaching belong to Iceland at the sam...
^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rs of lectures by a teacher in Spanish. Whereas, educators in Iceland spent the lowest ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, whereas, while, at least, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71551724138 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45270362121 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8179288213 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1538461538 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396225149042 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16322217257 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.216050586483 0.0843802449381 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344624876924 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.320346722783 0.0819641961636 391% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.