mix chart
The charts compare the amount of water used for agriculture, industrial and domestic in the world as well as the figure for water used in Brazil and democratic republic of congo.
It is clear that the demand on water in the world significantly rose from 1900 to 2000 and agriculture was the largest in water consumption. It can be seen that the figure for water consumed in Brazil was significantly higher than in Congo.
In 1900, around 500 km3 of water was used for agriculture all over the world. The amount of water consumption in industrial and domestic was one fifth of this. By 2000, the figure for water used for agriculture worldwide increased to 3000 km3 which used for industrial use rose to nearly half of this and water consumption for domestic use was approximately 500 km3.
In 2000, Brazil and Congo had a population of 176 million and 5,2 million respectively. Water consumption per person in Brazil was 359 m3, much higher than Congo, just 8 m3, and this can be explained by Brazil's irrigated land was 256 times higher than Congo.
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 78
- Question Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons of this trend What can be done to make cycling more popular 61
- the graph and the table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumotion in two different countries 67
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 78
- mix chart 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72826086957 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72240841195 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.169243157 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0187203857213 0.215688989381 9% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0104155891202 0.103423049105 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275570585704 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0208311782405 0.15604864568 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036080659094 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.