According to the reading passage, it is stated that Transient lunar phenomena, which is called TLP and are reflected from the surface of the Moon, have been obesrved for centuries by astronomers and several theories have been proposed for the occurrence of them. The article presents some of those theories. However, the professor in the listening section challenges the assumptions made in the reading passage, offering a different perspective and refuting these assertions through the presentation of three key reasons.
Firstly, the reading contends that instead of being a genuine lunar phenomena, those flash lights are random observational errors, caused by telescopes. The professor, however, raises skepticism about this notion by explaining that if this claim was true, the places of lights should have been pretty random as well. He emphasizes that since TLP are detected from very specific locations, it is more likely to be caused by real events happening on the Moon.
Secondly, the article asserts that meteors strike the Moon continuously, and after exploding generate flash lights, which can account for incident of TLP. On the contrary, the lecturer counters this idea by saying that lights generated from meteor explosion last only for a second, but the TLP continues approximately for twenty minutes. According to the professor, a few number of those lights can originate from meteor blowing ups, and the remaining must have other reasons.
Finally, the reading posits that another explanation for this phenomenon may be the light emitted by lunar rocks when exposed to the heat by the Sun. The professor disputes this claim by elaborating that the emitted light from the lunar rocks are weaker than the light Moon reflects. Therefore, recognizing thermoluminescence against this light background would be very arduous.
- The reading and lecture are both about the project assembled by a team The author of the reading states that work can be done effeciently in a group The lecturer disagrees He mentions involving people means creation of distinct ideas which could make work 76
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet Mars some t 3
- are negatives of photographs ansel adams work or not 80
- TPO62 76
- Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the presentation of three key reasons. Firstly, the reading contends that inste...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
...s that instead of being a genuine lunar phenomena, those flash lights are random observat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by real events happening on the Moon. Secondly, the article asserts that meteo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
... minutes. According to the professor, a few number of those lights can originate from mete...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the remaining must have other reasons. Finally, the reading posits that another...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39583333333 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80593369289 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.108860411 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37503914553 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123403066361 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11189536038 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213409843628 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496792941053 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.