Young people are often influenced by their peers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is generally believed that youngsters are usually under the influence of their friends. From my perspective, I agree with this belief; nevertheless, there are other extrinsic factors that can impact the young.
On the one hand, young people are, to some extent, impacted by friends. One prominent justification is that the young spend much of their time with their friends at school. This has facilitated the influence of their peers on them in terms of hobbies, personalities, and future goals. By way of illustration, if the young frequently spend their time studying, working, and conversing with bright students and colleagues, they are likely to have more interest in their work and study, and setting excellent peers as great examples for them to stay motivated and keep attempting. Similarly, if socializing and usually spending time with badly-behaved and mischievous individuals, it is inevitable that the young might become rebellious and disobedient to their parents and teachers.
On the other hand, I affirm that there are many external factors originating from family backgrounds that can deeply affect adolescents. Because of the closeness and the truth that young people spend most of their childhood time with their parents and relatives, it is undeniable that these caretakers have the most significant impact on them. For example, if children are nurtured in a family that is full of humane moral values and valuable traditions, they are inclined to become well-educated and virtuous citizens who can tremendously contribute to the development and prosperity of society. By contrast, if raised in a family where parents are delinquents or abusers, or addicted to drugs and illegal pharmaceuticals, youngsters are likely to receive unsuitable education and less tenderness from parents, hence growing up people with less morality and more antisocial characteristics
In conclusion, it is undoubtedly true that young people are affected by their peers with whom they usually spend time, parents and family backgrounds are also considerably influential factors that can shape their personalities and behaviors
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 78
- Nowadays more and more younger people need to compete with older people for the same jobs What problems does this cause What would you suggest as a solution 89
- Young people are often influenced by their peers To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 891, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity and more antisocial characteristics In conclusion, it is undoubtedly true th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51671732523 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08431421096 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528875379939 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 128.577725151 49.4020404114 260% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.0 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9090909091 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228125325985 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986107268899 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532832600556 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151666378533 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552774642864 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.