Global warming has sparked a global conversation these years due to its severity and devastating repercussions for the Earth. Deforestation and industrial activities, in my perspective, are the two leading reasons. However several effective solutions can be implemented to mitigate the current situation.
The degradation of forests and the poisonous emissions discharged from factories are the two primary causes of global warming. Firstly, the expansion of industrialization and urban planning result in the cutting down of trees and the obliteration of massive woodlands. Due to the loss of trees, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are not absorbed completely, hence they accumulate in great quantities in the atmosphere. In addition, human beings’ industrial activities release tons of contaminants and pollutants into the surrounding environment. These harmful chemicals accelerate the carbon dioxide emission from underground soil. Consequently, numerous greenhouse gases gradually increase in enormous amounts in the Earth’s atmosphere and absorb solar radiation that has bounced off the Earth's surface, thus trapping heat and warming the globe up.
Nonetheless, governments and citizens globally can join hands to abate the adverse effects of global warming. To commence with, leaders of all nations in the world ought to restrict hazardous industrial emissions and harmful chemical waste from being discharged into the surroundings. It is the authorities that promulgate rigid codes and strict regulations, as well as launching numerous media campaigns in order to raise awareness among citizens. Besides, every individual ought to seriously abide by environment-protecting requirements from the ruling classes. For example, owing to some radical changes in the garbage segregation and recycling process conducted by the government, Australia has witnessed a massive decline in the number of nylon bags and disposable products used, along with a surge in canvas bag quantities.
In conclusion, global warming has led to catastrophic consequences for the Earth, as well as pushing the global temperature to dangerously high levels; however, the aforementioned governmental policies and individual attempts would prevent global warming from worsening.
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 78
- Tourism is causing environmental problems all around the world What are the main causes of this What are some solutions 84
- Some people think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1207.87684729 161% => OK
No of words: 327.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96024464832 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31231202278 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 139.433497537 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639143730887 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 379.143842365 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5687415183 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.933333333 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145024452714 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421429159873 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563278567528 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975960157128 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507900457678 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.29 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 55.0591133005 249% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.