In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
An important contribution is such that enhances an overall development of a concept, opens up possible opportunities or brings up new ideas that can help enhances the concept and its unknown potentials. The prompt concludes that beginners have a higher possibility to make relevant contributions that the expert in the field. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the statement that expert has lesser tendency of making important contributions due to three main reasons.
Firstly, in order to make any important contribution in any field, it is important to understand the intricate part of the field. It requires understanding the trend in that field and how to better in traduce a new idea and its consequence. This description rightly suits an expert, the experts already understand the intricate part of the field and where there is a gap, hence, making it easier to make a contribution that will be important. For instance, a professor of animal science already understands what is lacking in the livestock industry let’s say “nutrition” and has read a lot of researches in that area has higher potential of making an immense contribution when compared to a graduate student who is just learning the basics of livestock nutrition.
More so, any important decision which a beginner wants to make will still have to pass through an expert because the beginner still need an expert who will encourage and even explain the relevance of the contribution he is making, this indirectly means that the expert still plays a key factor in making this contribution a reality. For example, a graduate student who is on the verge of making a huge discovery on quantum mechanics for example will be doing this under the tutelage of an expert who will guide his step and enhance that the result is obtained through the right mean, hence, the expert still plays a crucial role in this contribution and will be acknowledged.
It might be argued that a beginner has this fresh mindset of seeing things from a different perspective thereby making discoveries that will enhance vital contribution to such field. However, this fresh mindset will still use to grasp the basics and fundamentals of the field he is just entering, therefore, by the time he has grasp these fundamentals, then he can no longer be regarded as a beginner and has advanced. Therefore, any contribution he makes cannot be regarded as a beginner input. Therefore, important contributions can on ly be made by people who has been in the field and understands the needs and gaps to be filled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendations and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 75
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 58
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... However, this fresh mindset will still use to grasp the basics and fundamentals of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98364485981 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97437431537 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464953271028 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.0353580816 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.076923077 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9230769231 23.4991977007 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210906978287 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966544998485 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588892061409 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137972151799 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240439879056 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.