One serious problem in poor countries in recent years has been the lack of high-quality employment, especially in the healthcare field. The biggest culprit for this problem is the migration of professional medical workers including doctors and nurses from poor countries to richer countries to work. This situation leads to the low-quality healthcare system in poor countries and increases the distance between rich and poor countries in economy. To tackle these problems, the governments in poor countries need to enact policies that help improve the benefits for local medical professionals and increase the fees of migration to work abroad to limit the number of doctors and nurses going to work in richer countries.
The migration of medical professionals occasions the low-quality healthcare in poor nations pertaining to the lack of high-quality medical workers. The migration of a number of doctors and nurses to rich nations eventuate in the quality of healthcare in poor countries getting worse. Many medical professionals in poor countries usually choose to work in richer countries because the benefits in rich countries are often better than in their local. To overcome this difficulty, the governments should increase the benefits for medical professionals. Governments need to enact better policies for medical workers with higher salaries and other benefits. If medical professionals are given more benefits, they will work in their countries and not have to go abroad for a better life.
Another corollary of the migration of medical workers to work in rich nations is the distance between the growth of the economies in rich and poor countries. More and more high-quality medical workers in poor nations choose to migrate to richer countries to work means they contribute more to the economies of rich countries. This problem results in the difference between the economies of rich and poor nations. Rich countries will become richer; on the other hand, poor countries may become poorer. The solution to this problem is to limit the ability of a number of medical professionals to work overseas. To this end, the governments should raise the fees for migration, such as the fees for visas and work permits. If going to work in richer countries costs a lot, there will be fewer medical workers who have the ability to migrate to rich nations for work.
In conclusion, the migration of medical professionals to work in richer countries leads to the low-quality healthcare system of poor countries and the long distance between the economies of rich and poor countries. Only when governments in poor nations should establish measures that help strengthen benefits for local medical professionals and raise migration fees to work abroad, will the problems be solved.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28668171558 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87396418088 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.327313769752 0.561755894193 58% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0663407573 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.263157895 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3157894737 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341150386806 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143882761277 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086868183361 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258074434675 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410887816075 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28668171558 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87396418088 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.327313769752 0.561755894193 58% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0663407573 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.263157895 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3157894737 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341150386806 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143882761277 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086868183361 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258074434675 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410887816075 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.