Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
High schools should not just focus on the schools subjects; they should also prioritize voluntary works that serves a community. I completely agree with the given statement as it increases social responsibilities and also boost their academic performance. The viewpoints and the reasoning for supporting the view is fully explained in the forthcoming paragraphs.
Firstly, when students are engaged in such community work they will build the social responsibilities, which is a positive factor since it can make them socially aware. They will also be more connected towards outdoor social activities making them to uproot the introvert nature and assist them to be exposing to the service sector. This activity will also make them mentally as well as physically fit for the reason that they get the proper exposure with different people enabling them to learn from the others experience, and also make them physically fit by getting proper involvement in physical works around the community.
Second of all, scholars will also achieve higher academic success. This might be surprising but it is mostly found that students who are exposed to community service will have motive to make influence to the society, thus they have goal and are far more willing to achieve those goals than those who are just studying indoor with no activities involved. Moreover, they can learn beyond the curriculum which the others (curriculum focused students) lack. Therefore, to boost the academic performance and remain motivated these activities are mostly essential.
In conclusion, I believe if children are equipped with the opportunity to be engaged in unpaid community service they can learn about their social responsibilities and at the same time help to focus and be motivated to set goal and study harder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | phannhi1511@ | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | ankhanhvien | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | trangiangtie | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- You work for an international company and would like to spend six months working in its head office in another country Write a letter to your manager In your letter explain why you want to work in the company s head office for six months say how your work 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...n learn beyond the curriculum which the others curriculum focused students lack. There...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32167832168 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82021131525 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548951048951 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.1476782989 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.363636364 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127802437157 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050072338162 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468452564977 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918485946134 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459310383214 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.