In some countries, companies allow people to work from home. In others, people are still expected to work in an office. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the context of globalization and modernization, it is one of the policies of enterprises to permit their employees accomplish their duties at home. However, many are of belief to come to the office to work. The following paper will look at both viewpoints of this trend as well as providing my personal concept.
To begin with, giving the employees to have remote work can be beneficial to the firm on some aspects. First of all, this action would be an economical policy leading to a significant amount of saved budget. To explain, remote working does not require in-office utility expenditures such as wireless connection or electricity. Therefore, this may help companies to reduce the amount of money that they have to pay for monthly bills. The second upside is flexibility. White-collar workers who are allowed to stay at home to work would be able to prioritize their most essential tasks along with arranging their schedule in a logical order. As a result, the retention rate can be increased as employees are not under any pressure.
However, it is also the encouragement of several firms to let their workforce present at the offices. Having direct interaction at workplaces is likely to enhance the employee engagement. For example, when multiple workers are assigned to work in a team on a project, they will be more understanding to each other and the job satisfaction tends to be reinforced if their efforts are recognized. Thus, a dynamic workforce can be formed and employees are valued. Moreover, urgent tasks would be dealt immediately and effectively when workers are present at their offices. To illustrate, when there is a flaw in the job assigned, superiors can physically and directly come to their subordinates to get the mistakes corrected rather than wasting time on formally writing emails to inform. This leads to no procrastination in the working process as employees are not available to make a response.
In conclusion, I believe that whether it is remote working or in-office working, each of method has their own benefits. Personally, physical arrival at workplace would be a more dominant way as it reinforces the operation to be procedural.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | nguyen thanh sang | 75 | view |
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 78
- the pie charts show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugual between 1967 and 2007 73
- the graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
- The graph below shows the total revenue of three pizza places in Vietnam The figures were taken in 2017 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...l look at both viewpoints of this trend as well as providing my personal concept. To beg...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
.... First of all, this action would be an economical policy leading to a significant amount ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06111111111 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01260725438 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3246021991 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8947368421 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127678070666 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426662062487 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485524080158 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865631235608 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324823012607 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...l look at both viewpoints of this trend as well as providing my personal concept. To beg...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
.... First of all, this action would be an economical policy leading to a significant amount ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06111111111 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01260725438 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3246021991 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8947368421 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127678070666 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426662062487 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485524080158 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865631235608 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324823012607 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.