The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011, and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph shows the distribution of family yearly incomes in the United States for three years 2007, 2011, and 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the amount of money between $50,000 and $99,000 which was earned by US households remained stable, while the lowest and highest income groups saw increase trends over the period in question. Notably, the majority of US families could earn less than $50,000 a year.
In 2007, there were 25 million of family earning less than $25,000 in the United States. Despite the slight increase in 2011 to nearly $30,000, the figure then decreased marginally by about $2,000 four years later. The income bracket between $25,000 and $49,999 experienced a similar trend, which grew negligibly from $27,000 to $30,000 between 2007 and 2011 before dropping to roughly $28,000 in 2015.
Regarding the middle-income group from $50,000 to $74,999 and from $75,000 to $99,999, the data remained relatively stable across all three years that hovered around 20 million and 15 million respectively. Lastly, there was a minor fall from approximately $30,000 to about $25,000 in the income bracket exceeding $100,000 in 2007 and 2011. After that, the number of families went up considerably to nearly $35,000, this figure being the peak level of income during the whole period.
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food or products from animals such as medicine and clothing Do you agree or disagree with that statement 78
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 89
- The best way to ensure the growth of children is to make parents take parenting courses Do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...igure then decreased marginally by about ,000 four years later. The income bracket...
^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing 00,000 in 2007 and 2011. After that, the number of families went up considera...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, lastly, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00469483568 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34364955757 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.76294258 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109945909224 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059378723117 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376655617919 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892346813244 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352549188348 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...igure then decreased marginally by about ,000 four years later. The income bracket...
^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing 00,000 in 2007 and 2011. After that, the number of families went up considera...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, lastly, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00469483568 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34364955757 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.76294258 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109945909224 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059378723117 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376655617919 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892346813244 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352549188348 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.