The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows data about the proportion of urban residents who live in 4 countries in Asia, over a fifty-year period between 1970 and 2020, along with the data for the next twenty years.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there was a considerable upward trend in the percentage of people living in metropolises in all four countries. Another interesting point is that Indonesia was the country that contained the lowest proportion of city dwellers in 1970, but fifty years later, its data is in the second spot.
Looking at the details, as regards the Philippines, with about 32 percent at the start of 1970, then there was a fluctuation over the next 40 years, at which point it went up significantly and is predicted to reach approximately 50 percent in 2040. If we look at Thailand, the trend was similar. Having taken a fluctuation of around 30 percent in the first half of the century, the amount of population in urban areas compared to the whole country then is expected to rise sharply to nearly 50 percent in 2040, which will double the data from the beginning.
As for Malaysia, its data began at just 30 percent in 1970, it then skyrocketed to more than 70 percent in the next 50 years, and will continue to grow about 10 percent more which is the peak percentage of city dwellers during the whole period. With respect to Indonesia, it also saw a remarkable increase in the proportion of humans who settle in conurbations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 89
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food or products from animals such as medicine and clothing Do you agree or disagree with that statement 78
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification 56
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of humans who settle in conurbations.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, then, well, as for, as regards, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71484375 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68390645922 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.781242901 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.875 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177504805339 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766998473867 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484391184327 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118011158647 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343195942645 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.