The given bar chart illustrates the day-to-day minimum and maximum amounts of air contaminants on average in 4 cities in 2000.
Overall, Mexico City’s atmosphere was poisoned the most and Los Angeles had the lowest level of air pollutants in 2000. Additionally, there was a huge disparity among the proportions of the two poisoning gasses of the four subjects.
Both Los Angeles and Mexico City suffered N2O much more than SO2. The average daily maximums of N2O were 104 and 207 micrograms per m3 in Los Angeles and Mexico City respectively, while those of SO2 were only 10 and 200. Los Angeles was polluted by the SO2 gas at the lowest level of 2 micrograms per m3 each day, whereas it was 39 in terms of N2O. Mexico City’s minimum level of SO2 was 80 while that of N2O was more than 33 micrograms in comparison with it.
The opposite pattern could be seen in Calcutta and Beijing. The average maximum and minimum amounts of SO2 and N2O in Calcutta were not too different. When SO2 reached its peak at 59, N2O leveled off at 52 and the respective lowest points of them were 47 and 30. Regarding Beijing, it was contaminated by SO2’s the highest level of 100 and the lowest at 25 while N2O’s peak was just 54 and its minimum was 14 micrograms per m3 in 2000.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 84
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010 73
- The diagram shows the process by which sheep embryis are cloned 67
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r contaminants on average in 4 cities in 2000. Overall, Mexico City’s atmosphere...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53043478261 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56861970392 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517391304348 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8218330882 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7272727273 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252375883622 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110537180621 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993309315401 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190575940457 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887589799445 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.