The bar chart demonstrates the change for sharing expenditures for five different catagories in four different countries in the year 2009.
Overall, the percentage of spending on housing in United States was highest while the figure for expenditure on health care in United Kingdom was lowest.
Looking at the details, the three highest expenditures the percentage of spending on food in United States spent lowest with 14% while the figure of Japan was highest with nearly 24%. In addition, people in Canada and United States spent about 15% and 20% respectively for food. Regarding accommodation, United States had rate highest with 26% while Canadian rate was lowest with nearly 21%. In terms of transport, Candadian rate spent 20% of their total expenditure on this category while the figure for this expenditure in United States, United Kingdom and Japan were 18%, 15% and 10% respectively.
Furthermore, from two lowest expenditure people in United States spent on health care was highest with 13% and the percentage of people spent on health care in United Kingdom was lowet with 1%. Moreover, in terms of fashion, the figure of people in four countries using the items is about 5% similar.
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 73
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The line graph below shows the average monthly temperatures in three major cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below Write at least 150 words 67
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart demonstrates the change fo...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... different countries in the year 2009. Overall, the percentage of spending on h...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...of spending on housing in United States was highest while the figure for expenditure on hea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lth care in United Kingdom was lowest. Looking at the details, the three highes...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., United Kingdom and Japan were 18%, 15% and 10% respectively. Furthermore,...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n were 18%, 15% and 10% respectively. Furthermore, from two lowest expenditure...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12755102041 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6718087614 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438775510204 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4196734277 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256205236996 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13127656784 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719312692596 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179100304189 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505900685838 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.