Some people think that in this modern world getting old is entirely bad However other people believe that the life of old people is much better now than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion

In contemporary time, with the rapidly advancement of the quality of life, there breaks out a hotly-disputed issue that turning grey in this day and age is extremely bad, while others reckon that the old are having opportunities to make use of better services than in retrospect. These following paragraphs will take both assessments into consideration before arriving at a concrete conclusion.
To commence with, one of the most noticeable limitations of the elderly is that they find it challenging to keep up with youngsters, which perhaps creates generation gap. In other words, a mojority of the old has inevitable difficulties in having an understanding with young generation, who are frequently catch on trends stemmed from mass communication. By dint of this, they actually create an ageing barrier, which makes them get further and further.
Keep an eye on the bright side, there are substantial strengths that the elderly are able to benefit from, including the powerful enhancement of life and the history-preserving. First and foremost, a variety of living services springs up all over the world, particularly in densely populated cities as a consequence of strong development of modern technology with a view to answering the need of local residents. One of the most principal instances of this is the health service; therefore, it offers tremendous merits with old generation such as the convenience of looking after their well-being and prolonging their life expectancy. Furthermore, thanks to economical developed status quo, old people have chances to receive higher pension, as well as higher living standards. The second advantage is passing on long-standing and tradition. In fact, the more advanced life is, the more easily human have no recollection about the history. In this situation, the roles of old generation are pronouncedly taken emphasis over.
To recapitulate, even though the notable drawback as having limitations in seeing through the young, it is obvious that the merits consisting of developed services in terms of special needs and passing treasure tradion on their offspring are prevailed, which leads me to the belief that turning grey in modern time is absolutely advantageous.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keeping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: keeping
...lderly is that they find it challenging to keep up with youngsters, which perhaps creat...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'caught'.
Suggestion: caught
...th young generation, who are frequently catch on trends stemmed from mass communicati...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1025, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n are pronouncedly taken emphasis over. To recapitulate, even though the notable...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, therefore, well, while, in fact, such as, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36962750716 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15849263575 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613180515759 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.2538427941 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.153846154 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160013506984 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484688891651 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401554570691 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824290477474 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510531036979 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keeping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: keeping
...lderly is that they find it challenging to keep up with youngsters, which perhaps creat...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'caught'.
Suggestion: caught
...th young generation, who are frequently catch on trends stemmed from mass communicati...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1025, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n are pronouncedly taken emphasis over. To recapitulate, even though the notable...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, therefore, well, while, in fact, such as, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36962750716 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15849263575 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613180515759 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.2538427941 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.153846154 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160013506984 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484688891651 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401554570691 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824290477474 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510531036979 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.