Some parents give their children everything that their children ask for and accept what their children want to do. Is this good for children? What could be the consequences for these children when they grow up?
Dealing with the government’s incentive of 2 children under one roof, family parents have been shifting from familial quantity to their quality by inclining towards their childrens’ interests at all cost. In my opinion, this trend brings more latent drawbacks over its benefits during a kid’s upbringing process and leaves them with a fragile future due to the lack of self-management skills. In this essay, I will delve into the current and potential disadvantages offered by the practice of indulgence.
Indulging their children during the early years paves a wide avenue for the sense of insatiable requirement and heavy dependence. For example, children are more likely to view the second person, including their parents in this case, as an available machine which immediately supports all their needs, even though kids’ requirements are not truly necessary driven by their short-term wish or personal jealousy, creating unlimited boundaries of requests, both rational and irrational. Furthermore, the ready availability of assistance from parents fosters a sense of heavy reliance in children due to their satisfaction without personal effort and evaluation.
It couldn’t be blamed because every parental act comes from their love towards their children. However, this kind of family love should be navigated only by a strong mind which is able to envision their kids’ future. For example, the act of denial serves well as a method to sharpen children’s independence along with the ability of self-evaluation. When parents bravely say no to their children’s demands, children have to reflect whether their requirements are deserved or not and find ways to achieve their goals if it really fuels them. In other words, lacking the ability of independence and self-reflection inevitably comes as the shortcomes of parents’ inconsistency towards children’s demands.
In conclusion, while there is nothing to be blamed when parents indulge their children by accepting their needs, it is imperative for parents to balance parental love and unwavering determination to reinforce children’s ability to face harsh life conditions in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-03 | steveminh | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-05 | quynhnhi280103 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar 89
- Some people think the manufacturers or shopping malls should sell less packaged products and others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, really, second, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5696969697 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08457461426 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8190181613 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.166666667 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45471661573 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182471818622 0.084324248473 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107209606701 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304942595262 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809044074901 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.