Write about the following topic:
Should long-term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
There is no doubt that people who are government employees live their life to the fullest. Few peope argue that such people who receive benefits should be return to the community. I agree with the statement. In this essay, I will give the reasons for my agreement along with the examples.
To commence with, if you are the central employee, you get many benefits. This is because they are considered as a givernment servant who works for the nation. The merits are free accomodation, health insurance, and travel-free state-wide. For instance, the railway employee gets free travel for entire family as a part of their relaxation. Even though they earn hefty salary, they get to enjoy their facilities. On the other hand the private employee cannot have the same. They have to pay for each service. In short, civilians do not get equal facility.
Furthermore, another reason to do noble cause can be that they are assured by job-security and retirement pensions, while the other have to purchase the private schemes. For example, the person has to buy health plan for his/her dependents. In recent times, cracking a state job has become next level difficult. It can be considered as a nepotism which has created disparity among such groups. To level such differences, one should do noble work for the betterment of the society.This will make a difference.
In my opinion, Although it is fair that government job seekers can earn benefits as they serve to the country, they should give it back to the community. Voluteers should compensate within the country and every citizen deserves such easiness.
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000 The total budget was AED 315 billion
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- Eco tourism often involves visiting remote and fragile ecosystems which raises concerns about the impact on local cultures and indigenous communities What problems can this cause How can these problems be resolved 89
- You recently found out that the local council has decided to demolish a particular building in your area You disagree with this decision and believe that the building is beneficial for the community Write a letter to the local councilor In your letter exp 73
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
There is no doubt that people who are government employees live their life to...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'returned'?
Suggestion: returned
...h people who receive benefits should be return to the community. I agree with the stat...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with the examples. To commence with, if you are the central employee, you get...
^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... work for the betterment of the society.This will make a difference. In my opinio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in short, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01865671642 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70884986021 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59328358209 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7761902075 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7894736842 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1052631579 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202012210381 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546911039291 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526116197977 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127102376403 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399579759105 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.