The bar graph shows the number of men and women participant at adult education center in the year 2009. The pie diagram describes the age groups of these course participant.
The bar graph illustrates the proportion of male and female learner those who take training on drama, painting, sculpture and language at adult learning point in the year 2009 and the pie diagram describes the age groups of these course trainee. Overall, it can be seen that the female learners were higher in number for all the courses except sculpture and participants from 50 or over age group were great portion while under 20 age group where were very lowest.
In details, the women are highly interested in the language course and 40 female learners were enrolled whereas, only 20 male candidates were enrolled that indicates women were twice of male candidate. For sculpture course it was just showing the reverse situation of language course that is men candidates were twice of women learners. On the other hands, 20 women were admitted for drama course and 10 men were admitted in the same course that was half of the women learner. In addition to that, men and women candidate were little bit higher than men that only 5 persons.
In terms of age group, over 50 were close to double of 40-49 age group and approximately triple to 30 to 39 age group. Apart from that, 20 -29 age group were only 11% that was four time less than over 50 group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 73 | view |
- This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 73
- International tourists should pay more than the local visitor for cultural and historical attractions Do you agree or disagree 78
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant example for this 61
- The graph below shows the population of India and China from the year 2000 to the present day with projections for growth to the year 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The line 73
- The bar graph shows the number of men and women participant at adult education center in the year 2009 The pie diagram describes the age groups of these course participant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: higher
...n be seen that the female learners were higher in number for all the courses except sculpture an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...n to that, men and women candidate were little bit higher than men that only 5 persons. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, apart from, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68018018018 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31470616308 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4401908061 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301303425029 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139844177362 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082340456757 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202779660655 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954541676136 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.