The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided table illustrates the police income in a certain British area in two years 2017 and 2018, while the accompanying pie chart shows the spending categories which the police department distributed over the examined years.
Overall, there was a marginal increase in the amount of monetary contribution among all three sources in 2018 compared to 2017. Additionally, while the part spending on building and transport investments experienced a stability throughout the two years surveyed, the technology and salaries sections witnessed a slight change.
According to the table, there was a rise of approximately 14 million in the total budget of the police department in the comparison of the year 2017 and 2018. The majority of this alternation was attributed to local taxes, accounting for over two thirds of the income change at 11.1 million (from 91.2 million in 2017 to 102.3 million in 2018). The other two categories, including national government and other sources, contributed to this department with 2.3 million and 0.5 million, respectively.
Moving on to the pie chart, the rise of 6 percent (from 8 percent to 14 percent) in the technological spending over the two years was at the expense of the portion of buildings and transport investments, which decreased from 75 percent in 2017 to 69 percent in 2018. However, salaries for officers and staff remained constant at 17 percent in both 2017 and the following year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- in their advertising business nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way 84
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people like to eat unhealthy food even though they know it s bad for them Why is this What is an effective way to improve people s healthy eating habits 84
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17167381974 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9499437328 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523605150215 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6203403937 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.625 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179797466078 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800849511334 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704560956929 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115175182667 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716610183719 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17167381974 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9499437328 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523605150215 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6203403937 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.625 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179797466078 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800849511334 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704560956929 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115175182667 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716610183719 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.