People who have high expectations for others are rewarded with high performance and respect.
Anyone that expects more from others is usually rewarded with a high performance an utmost respect. That should not go without saying that expecting much from people may often times lead them to become less courageous or even complacency
First and foremost, it is usually a very good idea to hold high expectations for others as this would yield increased performance, take a case of a boss and a worker for example, the standard the worker is being held to will enable the worker to utilise his/her ability to the maximum level because he feels there is a bar he has to meet up to and there would be a mutual respect due to the satisfaction arising from the result.
Another example is in the case of a parent and their child, a way to ensure an even better performance or output is to hold the said child to a higher standard, due to the presence of an expectation, the child feels any result below the standard is unacceptable and as such strives to meet the standard
It is also worthy to note that holding high expectations breeds healthy competition in people as this ensures they outdo the prior version of themselves regardless of what field or task
Higher expectation can be seen as a metric which can be used to rate people, the presence of an acceptable result helps to reduce nonchalance, complacency and self satisfaction in a bid to meet the laid down expectation.
Holding people to high expectations is a very important tool that is advantageous all through the spheres of life as it’s births high performance, high productivity and congenial respect
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2020-04-03 | elisabetta_fedele | 50 | view |
| 2020-04-03 | elisabetta_fedele | 50 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | Makuei | 50 | view |
| 2014-12-29 | radwa hanafy | 65 | view |
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 66
- The drawbacks to the use of nuclear power mean that it is not a long term solution to the problem of meeting eve increasing energy needs 83
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 50
- Title The Influence of Challenges on the Perceived Greatness of Political Leaders 66
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the worker is being held to will enable the worker to utilise his/her ability to...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... better performance or output is to hold the said child to a higher standard, due...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of an acceptable result helps to reduce nonchalance, complacency and self satisf...
^^
Line 6, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt tool that is advantageous all through the spheres of life as it’s births high ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73090909091 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80411503991 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549090909091 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.2370786517 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 68.0 23.0359550562 295% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 255.477371796 60.3974514979 423% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 325.25 118.986275619 273% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 68.75 23.4991977007 293% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.21951772744 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318365005686 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.251866465578 0.0831039109588 303% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135535728179 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160913846494 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122160865461 0.0667264976115 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.2 14.1392134831 249% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 10.92 48.8420337079 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 28.6 12.1743820225 235% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.34 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.38706741573 125% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.8971910112 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 29.2 11.2143820225 260% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 11.7820224719 246% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the worker is being held to will enable the worker to utilise his/her ability to...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... better performance or output is to hold the said child to a higher standard, due...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of an acceptable result helps to reduce nonchalance, complacency and self satisf...
^^
Line 6, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt tool that is advantageous all through the spheres of life as it’s births high ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73090909091 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80411503991 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549090909091 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.2370786517 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 68.0 23.0359550562 295% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 255.477371796 60.3974514979 423% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 325.25 118.986275619 273% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 68.75 23.4991977007 293% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.21951772744 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318365005686 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.251866465578 0.0831039109588 303% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135535728179 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160913846494 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122160865461 0.0667264976115 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.2 14.1392134831 249% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 10.92 48.8420337079 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 28.6 12.1743820225 235% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.34 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.38706741573 125% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.8971910112 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 29.2 11.2143820225 260% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 11.7820224719 246% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.