Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development
In contemporary society, it is noticeable that there is an income disparity between well-known people in the entertainment business and those who work for legislative service. This gap can be explained by their distinctive sources of income, and in my opinion, it results in disadvantages for society’s development.
To commence with, the income difference comes from the fact that celebrities can derive income from diversified sources while politicians’s salary depends on the quite tight state budget. Notably, famous stars make money not only from their primary professions but also from lucrative endorsement deals with corporate giants. To illustrate, apart from film casting compensation, internationally renowned actors amass substantial wealth through ambassador agreements with major fashion brands like Channel, and Louis Vuitton. By contrast, people working in national organizations rely on fixed salaries and are constrained by their roles in the political arena, which seldom intersect with the commercial world. In fact, politicians are generally banned from cultivating commercial connections with corporations to avoid the abuse of power leading to their limited income packages.
From my perspective, the pay gap between celebrities and politicians poses a negative impact on social mobility. First and foremost, it represents inequity as governmental officials are those who make more significant social changes. A lawmaker enhancing social welfare that affects the lives of millions deserves to be paid a decent salary as a singer who is made popular by the media. In addition, lower pay for politicians might discourage talented people from applying for governmental organizations, causing a shortage of effective lawmakers. If this shortage is prolonged, it can reduce the effectiveness of **the state system and the overall development of a country.
In conclusion, the fact that celebrities are using multiple channels to increase their wealth while politicians heavily rely on their state-sponsored salary is causing an enormous pay gap between them. However, I consider this trend to be unjustifiable as it fails to fairly compensate for the contribution of officials and demotivates productive individuals to join the government.
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant 78
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 84
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04012345679 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51846843153 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635802469136 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3812420087 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.785714286 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144068287059 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504673352757 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372655056863 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894578070365 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387476163905 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.05 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.