Nowadays, most countries can improve the standard of living through economic development, but some social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of this phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages?
In this modern era, social-economic harmony represents the balanced coexistence of economic prosperity and social well-being, however in this day and age, the majority of nations can ameliorate the living standards by spearheading economic growth, however it simultaneously led to loss of social significance. This compels me to purposefully explore the adequacies and flows behind this notion and will discuss it in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, economic expansion typically leads to increased income levels and access to better healthcare, education, and basic amenities. To elaborate further, this directly contributes to an improved lifestyle for the population, reducing poverty and improving overall well-being. Apart from this, it often necessitates the improvement of infrastructure, including roads, bridges, public transportation, and utilities. This not only enhances the quality of life but also supports economics growth. Furthermore, it also fosters innovation and technological progress. For instance, if countries invest in research and development, they can improve the quality of products and services, making life easier and more convenient. In addition, there is often an improvement in healthcare infrastructure as well, including the availability of hospitals clinics, medical professionals. This results in better healthcare access and increased life expectancy.
On the contrary, one of the most significant drawbacks of economic development is the potential for increased income inequality. As wealth accumulates in the hands of few, it can lead to social disparities and tensions. Moreover, rapid development can sometimes erode traditional cultures and values and lifestyles, potentially leading to the loss of indigenous cultures. What is more, the fast-paced and competitive nature of economic development can lead to increased stress level and mental health issues. Thus, high-pressure work environments and the pursuits of material wealth can negatively impact mental well-being.
Taking everything into consideration, I iterate that though the advantages of this outnumber the disadvantages. However, balancing economic growth with social and environmental consideration is crucial to ensuring that the benefits of development are sustainable and equitable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | kuldip.kumar@hotmail.com | 84 | view |
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened and that you want your money back 78
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Older people often choose to spend money on themselves e g on holidays rather than save money for their children after retirement Is this a positive or negative development 87
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say the main way to be happy in life is to have a lot of money How might having a lot of money make people happy What other things in life can make people happy 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13888888889 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4273923566 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614197530864 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7865060874 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26865667351 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736176884863 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426344289397 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150784387465 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293518147442 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.33 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.