Do you agree or disagree with the following
statement? Only movies that can teach us something about real life is worth watching.
The statement that only movies that can teach us something about real life are worth watching is a narrow perspective. While movies do possess educational value, their worth should not be solely determined by their ability to provide insights into real-life experiences. I think movies encompass a wide range of genres and themes, each offering unique perspectives that contribute to the enrichment of our lives.
Movies have the power to promote cultural understanding and appreciation. Foreign films, for instance, provide insights into different cultures, traditions, and perspectives, broadening our horizons and fostering global empathy. By immersing ourselves in stories from diverse backgrounds, we cultivate tolerance and celebrate the richness of human diversity. Films such as "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" and "Parasite" are prime examples of movies that transcend national boundaries and contribute to cultural exchange.
Furthermore, movies allow for emotional connection and catharsis. Dramas and tragedies explore the depths of human emotions, enabling viewers to empathize with characters and vicariously experience their journeys. These emotionally charged films, such as "The Shawshank Redemption" or "Rain Man," provide a platform for contemplation and self-reflection, helping individuals make sense of their own emotional experiences.
In conclusion, while movies certainly have the capacity to teach us valuable lessons about real life, their merit should not be confined solely to this aspect. Movies also offer artistic expression, cultural understanding, and emotional connection. It is through this multifaceted nature that movies enrich our lives and contribute to our personal growth and development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 78 | view |
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ribute to the enrichment of our lives. Movies have the power to promote cultura...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and contribute to cultural exchange. Furthermore, movies allow for emotional ...
^^^
Line 6, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...shank Redemption' or 'Rain Man,' provide a platform for contemplation a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se of their own emotional experiences. In conclusion, while movies certainly ha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24796747967 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36772119354 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658536585366 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.510562558 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.230769231 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233131888144 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921690100288 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160025820111 0.0667982634062 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149354960643 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145691748414 0.056905535591 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.97 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.