Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability. But some people believe there are many factors that contribute to success at sports.
Which factors success at sports lies in has been a hotly debated topic, with some people advocating physical ability. While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I would argue that sport success can be a result of luck and mental well-being.
Admittedly, it is understandable why some people attribute success to physical well-being. Sports, by its nature, require a long process of training to stand a higher chance of being successful. For example, sprinting athletes have to train their endurance, agility, and speech, which cannot easily be achieved without physical capability. This is a testament to how significantly physical well-being contributes to one’s sport success.
However, I believe that there are other factors leading to one’s success in sports. Firstly, mental well-being has an indispensable role to play in determining whether they win the competition or not. Imagine a situation where an athlete who has exerted themselves to earn a victory falters and gives up at the last minute just because he is afraid of losing. Aside from this, professional skills are also of paramount importance. Evidently, a sports competitor acquiring sufficient knowledge and skills associated with their chosen sport field and practicing regularly can outplay those who hardly sharpen their skills. Finally, success in sports can be ascribed to luck. Consider this scenario: two runners are about to reach the final line to win, but one of them falls down due to a slippery running road and ends up losing the competition. This goes to show the profound impacts of luck on one’s success in sports.
In conclusion, while there are justifications for considering physical ability as the factor leading to whether one is successful in sports, I would contend that mental health, professional ability, and luck can also be important factors leading to success in sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-09 | tteruchan65 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarize the information by selecting and report 84
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Question The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What are the reasons for the growth of overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 89
- Doctos role as educators 11
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...o of paramount importance. Evidently, a sports competitor acquiring sufficient knowled...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to sport'
Suggestion: to sport
...and skills associated with their chosen sport field and practicing regularly can outp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3355704698 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92156832219 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607382550336 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.497248112 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321715306078 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113135754281 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112480330185 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210144063858 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724495649503 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.