The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first line graph gives some information about the percentage of households with electrical appliances from 1920 and 2019, while the second shows the number of hours that every household consume in every week in the same time period.
It is obvious that, in fist line graph vacuum cleaner and refrigerator has increased and washing machine fluctuated between 1920 and 2019, but in second line graph the number of hours per week decreased in that time.
As can be seen, there was a raise sharply in sixty consecutive years around 5% to 100% and after that has a plateaued trend until last year in refrigerator. This is true about vacuum cleaner it was 30% in 1920 and increased until 100% in 2000 and after that did not change until 2019, but washing machine surged ordered in 1920,1940, and 1960 exactly 30% from 40% and then dropped about 8% in has grown again in the remain year more than 70%.
While in second line graph there was a totally fall slightly until 2019, but from 1920 to 1960 it has a steady decrease more than 30% and after than its plunge became less than before from 20% to more than 10%.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... dropped about 8% in has grown again in the remain year more than 70%. While in second li...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('totally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
.... While in second line graph there was a totally fall slightly until 2019, but from 1920 to 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than before from 20% to more than 10%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20871003076 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6922055065 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.2 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.0 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124399808732 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722811894002 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06425978377 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864154069099 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616115442781 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.26 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... dropped about 8% in has grown again in the remain year more than 70%. While in second li...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('totally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
.... While in second line graph there was a totally fall slightly until 2019, but from 1920 to 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than before from 20% to more than 10%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20871003076 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6922055065 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.2 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.0 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124399808732 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722811894002 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06425978377 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864154069099 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616115442781 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.26 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.