The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with prediction for 2030 and 2040.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of four distinct cities form Asian countries between 1970 and 2020, and a forecast for 2030 and 2040.
It is obvious that the Malaysia reached significantly the peak and has an upward trend. Malaysia and Indonesia rose and other two countries have fluctuated trend from 1970 and 2040.
As can be seen, the percentage of Malaysia was 30% in 1970 then increased about 12% until 1990. By 2000 it has a raise slightly more than 45% five consecutive decades until 2040. In 2040 the population of Malaysia reached the peak over the 80%. Two Philippines and Thailand countries have same trend while the start point of them were different. After three consecutive decades which the population in Thailand grow about 10% until 1990 it did not change to 2020 and surge remain years more than 12%. Whereas Philippines was stable in 1970 and 1980 then increase by 20% in 1990 and suddenly drop to 2010 approximately 10% nearby 40%. It has a steady increase until 2040. One of the countries that has a significant increase was Indonesia. There was a upward trend and reached the rate of Thailand’s population in 2000 and the in 2010 across Philippines’s rate. from 2010 to 2040 the rate of people has regulatory increase by more 23%.
As a result, Indonesia located in second place after Malaysia which has peak point. Other two countries did not change significantly.
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with prediction for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selection and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...ppines and Thailand countries have same trend while the start point of them were diff...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 749, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...icant increase was Indonesia. There was a upward trend and reached the rate of Th...
^
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
... the in 2010 across Philippines’s rate. from 2010 to 2040 the rate of people has reg...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8870292887 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69656101847 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510460251046 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7749226628 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8666666667 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178270007957 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647696836935 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774535109208 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135726323459 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116361821763 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.