The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with prediction for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with prediction for 2030 and 2040.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the percentage of people congestion in four different Asian countries between 1970 and 2020, with prediction for 2030 and 2040.
It is obvious that Malaysia, Thailan, and Indonesian have an upward trend thoroughly in the period even in prediction. There was a fluctuated trend in Philippines. The prediction shows the percentage of population in Indonesia, Philippines, and Thailand will near to each other. The Indonesia across other two countries and passed them, the point is the Malaysia has the maximum population among others.
As can be seen, by 1970 Although the minimum percentage was about Indonesia near a quarter it increased and in 2000 reached Thailand which both of them have raised. This country across Philippines too by 2010 of about 40% and increased until 2040 by 60%. There was a three decades went up consecutively, then four decades leveled until 2020 and forecasting shows reach to nearly 45% in 2040. The Malaysia increased sharply until 2040 from 29% to around 81% that is the maximum percentage. By 1990 the rate of population in Philippines was more than Malaysia but decreased in three decades and then will raise again by forecasting.
In conclusion, the point is all countries increased their population and this continue till 2040 but this people need to row material that should provide and governments set roles.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-26 Ahmad_off 84 view
2024-08-26 Ahmad_off 84 view
2024-01-22 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-01-22 Ahmad_off view
2024-01-22 Ahmad_off 61 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould provide and governments set roles.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15625 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81715530256 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575892857143 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4474035171 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207576025121 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786578942885 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926273729071 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149929837307 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120811120409 0.0819641961636 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.