The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005.
The chart illustrates how much governments in four countries invested in roads and transport between 1990 and 2005.
Overall, there was a decline in the proportion of government spending on roads and transport in Italy, Portugal and the UK, while a rise was seen in the USA. In addition, Portugal generally had the highest figures throughout the period.
The share of the government's budget spent on roads and transport in Portugal started at about 27%, after which it saw a progressive decrease to exactly 20% in 2005. Conversely, the figure for the USE rose from just over 10% in 1990 to 15% in 2005, despite a small fall in the first 5 years.
Approximantely 22% of the Italian national budget was spent on the transport infrastructure, with subsequent fluctuations and a final decline from 24% in 2000 to about 19% in 2005. Similarly, the figure for the UK fluctuated in the range from 9% to 13% from 1990 to 2000, before ending the period at around 7%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-04 | Sang Sang Sang | 80 | view |
2024-02-07 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
2024-02-07 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
2023-08-31 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
2022-12-09 | minh phương phạm hồng | 67 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 80
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words You should sp 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 167 200
No. of Characters: 762 1000
No. of Different Words: 96 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.595 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.563 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.836 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 47 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.379 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.46 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.46 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.075 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4