The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the UK, the rest of Europe and Japan from 1993 to 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the proportions of joblessness in the three regions: the UK, Europe and Japan between 1993 and 2007.
Overall, the percentage of unemployment in the country of Japan increased, while the unemployment percentages of the other two areas decreased. It is also noticeable that Europe was the region with the highest unemployment rate in the final year.
Regarding the period from 1993 to 1999, Japan began at exactly 2%, as the lowest percentage, then it rose to around 3% and remained unchanged until 1999. Europe took up the percentage which was more than 4 times higher than Japan, then it grew to almost 12% and dropped to precisely 10% in the end. The proportion of joblessness in the UK was over 5 times higher than that in Japan in the beginning, and then fell steadily to about 6% in 1999.
Concerning the rest of the provided time, Japan increased to 6% in 2003 and decreased by 2% in the final year, standing at the lowest level. Europe saw a stable fall to the figure which was nearly 2 times higher than Japan’s, as the top position. The UK’s joblessness rate dropped slight in 2001 and leveled out during the next 4 years before growing to 6% in the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The picture below shows the process of growing and making products from pineapples Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference center in 2010 and 2025 as proposed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... years before growing to 6% in the end.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66197183099 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62701123635 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553990610329 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.7361514522 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19611078905 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859914636347 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469540874054 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13384506443 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462965944559 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.