The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs demonstrate the variation that has taken place in the ownership of electrical appliances of households and the amount of hours spent on doing housework and households in a specific country from 1920 to 2019.
In general, while the number of households owning electrical appliances, such as washing machines, refrigerators, and vacuum cleaners increased over this course, the amount of time taken to complete housework per week per household witnessed a significant decrease.
Regarding electrical equipment, there were upward trends occurring throughout nearly a century in utilizing these useful machines in households. Washing machines experienced a sharp increase in its first 40 years from 40% in 1920 to 70% in 1960. The figure suffered from a decline in the next 20 years by nearly 10%, before rebounding until the end of the period, at over 70%. While vacuum cleaners had a remarkable increase over the 1900s from 30% in 1920 to 100% in 2000 and stayed unchanged to the end of the time frame, refrigerators witnessed a steep jump when starting at 0% in 1920 and quickly reaching 100% in 1980, making way for a stable growth by 2019.
In terms of hours spent doing housework per week per family, the data showed, firstly, a strong decline from 1920 to 1960, with 50 hours and 20 hours, respectively. Between 1960 and 2019, this figure continually decreased but not as sharply as in the first 40 years, at 10 hours in 2019 per household in a week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | karenthudoan | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | hannahbui | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 84
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79403770951 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1243811851 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214715815576 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961246955622 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977121202673 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159144030034 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102637142365 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79403770951 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1243811851 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214715815576 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961246955622 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977121202673 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159144030034 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102637142365 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.