In some countries, students live with their family while studying at a university. In other countries, students attend university in another city. Do you think the advantages of living away from the family while attending university outweigh the disadvantages?
Students in some regions still live with their family during university years, whereas others choose to move away to study. In my opinion, I believe that living away from parents to study in universities from afar can be more beneficial to students than harming them and will explain the reasons in this essay.
Separating from family can benefit students in their university in two aspects. The first aspect is that this action can improve students’ independence when facing new things, which is a crucial factor for their future life. Since they move away, there will be no parents to help them do chores or to take care of them when they are sick. By doing this, they can become more independent in caring for their own university life without relying too much on the assistance from family. For example, some exchange students who used to depend on parents’ help for cooking can actually be able to cook for themselves after a few years of studying in another country. The second aspect is that this phenomenon can help students cherish the help of parents more instead of overlooking it. Living away might mean that students have to deal with difficulties without parents helping them all the time. This allows them to cherish their parents’ support in many situations. For instance, when students fìnd it difficult to live in a strange place, they might miss the comfortable life they have in their family, where parents are always there to support them physically and mentally.
However, there are two drawbacks of moving away from family to study in a university. The first one is homesickness as students cannot always have the affection and care from family while living away, but I believe that these difficult moments can help students become mentally stronger and respect their families more after dealing with it several times. Another disadvantage is that moving away to study at university can be expensive for students. However, this problem can be solved since there are families who still support their children financially during university years despite living far from each other. For example, there are many international students who travel to the US to study with their parents paying for all the tuition fees and living expenses.
In conclusion, I think that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. This phenomenon can strengthen students’ independence from family, which is advantageous to their future life. Moreover, it can wake up the hidden respect for family affection that students might overlook when living near parents and siblings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-31 | reverjae | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | iamkristinjoi | 90 | view |
- With the pressures on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school eg physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 61
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 70
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say the fashion industry has a bad effect on people s lives Do you agree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, then, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14691943128 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59829773932 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464454976303 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7615922824 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.315789474 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2105263158 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346382622026 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134302541603 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813274991065 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269140039183 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860019599844 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, then, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14691943128 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59829773932 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464454976303 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7615922824 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.315789474 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2105263158 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346382622026 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134302541603 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813274991065 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269140039183 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860019599844 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.