Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people think a university education is the best direction to a prospering career; however, others presume that working straight after high school is a better option. From my perspective, studying at university is my preference as it is a crucial contribution to a person's skills.
On the one hand, attending university contributes to a worker's expertise and increases the rate of job acceptance. First, a proper university education provides students with specialized knowledge. Thus, undergraduates can strengthen the foundation of their major field of study to deal with difficulties at work. For example, 70% of the US officers who attended university, found malfunction less stressful as they developed solutions to problems since university. Moreover, a university certificate precipitates the chances of a well-paid job as companies prioritize workers with compulsory skills. For instance, 60% of Vietnamese corporations prefer workers who have university certificates to uneducated ones.
On the other hand, a job straight after high school helps people make money earlier than university attendees as they do not need to study. For example, a manicurist is profitable for many people as they do not need a university certificate but can still earn money. Furthermore, working without a university could develop new skills for people as they work different jobs to make money. According to the UK workers who skipped university, working early creates a helpful experience for them to work in multiple fields.
In conclusion, although working without a university education fastens the process of moneymaking and develops new skills for workers, I assume it is better to have a proper university education since it helps obtain crucial knowledge and betters the chances of job acceptance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | taoxanh99 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | Celina Pei | 80 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | tran@thuylinh2 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | zhao_kangg | 61 | view |
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 67
- Discuss the challenges and opportunities that your community has been facing as a result of the COVID 19 pandemic 56
- With the pressures on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school eg physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 56
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
..., attending university contributes to a workers expertise and increases the rate of job...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50902527076 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18117532498 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2193863228 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190557595563 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757364551902 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739991838827 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137288516264 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759554570913 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.