It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.
The statement claims that compromise one's beliefs is more harmful than adhering to them. I disagree with this statement insofar as one's belief are never always right and one can not be the expert for thinking in different area. To adhere to any belief, everyone must think in a different perspective and should take ideas from others and them should maintain this. This is less harmful than to adhere only one's belief. However, one's only know the real condition and to adhere the one's belief is the most relliable and harmless solution to get rid of the dangerous situation. Everyone has the own judgment capabilities and the one's belief is more suitable and comfortable for them to maintain.
One compelling argument in favor of my position is Any person can not be the expart in every area. In any critical situation, one's belief is less suitable and less likely to get rid of than to take advise from the expert on this particular area. An expert has the proper deep knowledge and critical thinking abilities to advise how to get rid of. In this case, it is more harmful to adhere the one's beliefs than to take advice and compromise the personal belief and opinion. For example, If any person take the decision to buy a home then he should take the proper advise from house expart rather than to belief his own opinion.
Another argument is to take any decision, people should be more scrutinized. For this he have to think from different perspective. For this different people's opinions is more important than to adhere the one's belief. Different people can think in different way and to judge the different thinking will open different problems and this will reduce the complexity. For instance, if any person decide to take the house loan then he has to take the opinion from different people who already took this loan. This will help to take the proper decision rather than to adhere the one's belief.
Moreover, One's belief sometimes make bias and this is more likely can create dengerous situation. To make the belief biasness, we should reconcile different peoples opinion.
However, everyone has the different problems and each person know better his conditions rather than others. So compromising one's belief to take any decision can more likely be harmful than adhere. Additionally, everyone has the own judgment capability. He can take decisions and this will make him more comfortable than reconciling other's belief.
In conclusion, in some cases adhere the one's belief will more likely create dengerous situation and in most cases expert opinion has value and the opinion of the connoisseur is more important rather than to adhere the one's belief. Additionally decision from different perspective can help to make the decision accurately. So to take any decision or adhere the belief, should reconcile the one's belief with expert and also think from a different perspective. This will less harmful than to adhere one's belief blindly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-04-09 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-03 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | LauraTing | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | ibralieah1030 | 66 | view |
- The graph shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons 61
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 58
- The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 58
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
The statement claims that compromise ones beliefs is more harmful than adhering t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...disagree with this statement insofar as ones belief are never always right and one c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... every area. In any critical situation, ones belief is less suitable and less likely...
^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...should be more scrutinized. For this he have to think from different perspective. Fo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: One's
...n to adhere the ones belief. Moreover, Ones belief sometimes make bias and this is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ons rather than others. So compromising ones belief to take any decision can more li...
^^^^
Line 6, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
... rather than to adhere the ones belief. Additionally decision from different perspective can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 496, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
.... This will less harmful than to adhere ones belief blindly.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2459.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95766129032 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53804221126 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.338709677419 0.4932671777 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4930147841 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0740740741 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3703703704 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2962962963 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464352940549 0.243740707755 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190995616324 0.0831039109588 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180059946281 0.0758088955206 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308395106167 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142645398257 0.0667264976115 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.