Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence, while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways. What is your opinion?
Do you think you are successful because you are intelligent?! For decades, people have been connecting success to intelligence. They tend to evaluate the intelligence of others according to their level of success. However, others believe that being successful doesn't necessarily mean a person is intelligent. This essay agrees on the
fact that there are many other ways to evaluate a person's intelligence through people's personalities and IQ tests.
People's personalities play an important role in measuring the intelligence of
others. It's important for a person to have think positively towards everything.Furthermore, it is related to how a person perceive what is going on around him and how far a person can go to develop his personal traits. As a result, a person
could be considered successful by his ability to express himself or how he could deliver his perspectives to others or how he deals and wins others by merely talking or how he performs a task successfully. Moreover, another way for
estimating people’s intelligence is the IQ tests.
Recently, IQ tests have become a viral way of measuring people's intelligence.
Some jobs also ask the employees to take IQ tests in order to estimate their level of
thinking and their reactions towards specific situations. For example, if a person is
applying to work as a flight attendant, he needs to undergo different tests to find
out whether he is fit to work or not. One of these tests is the IQ test that assess
human's intelligence through a variety of questions and situations.
In a nutshell, being a successful person does not determine how intelligent you are.
Yet, there are many ways to estimate people's intelligence other than being
successful or not. It depends on a person's personality and the tests that tell how a
person could be intelligent.
- Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth However some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 56
- Should animals be used in testing new drugs and procedures Gives reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 89
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 11
- The diagram details the process of making leather products 78
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r, others believe that being successful doesnt necessarily mean a person is intelligen...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...there are many other ways to evaluate a persons intelligence through peoples personalit...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...ers. Its important for a person to have think positively towards everything.Furthermo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ave think positively towards everything.Furthermore, it is related to how a person perceive...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ng successful or not. It depends on a persons personality and the tests that tell how...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2179505578 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508305647841 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6223142284 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.38176352705 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328878798327 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132385423315 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743997031268 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117772066745 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873446961248 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.