The demand for online coaching services and video courses has grown significantly in the digital age. Some now feel this method of learning is a superior option to in-person learning.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the high-technological world, the upsurging demand for distance learning is more prevalent due to the significant amount of online video sources available. Several perspectives argue that it can be more superb than face-to-face learning. I personally agree with this perspective based on several factors, namely, convenience, flexibility, and diverse studying data.
Virtual learning can underpin convenience and versatility for learners. Learners can obtain various knowledge and skills anytime and anywhere. They should not make their way to study physically and can also study based on their flexible schedule. In the Covid-19 pandemic period, for example, various individuals stay at home to study and research courses through several prestigious online learning foundation such as Udemy or Coursera. This leads to flexibility and safety for them as they do not have to commute in the community to take the course they strive.
Furthermore, diverse study sources are also a noticeable reason that retain various learners for virtual learning. A plethora of webpages provide available videos gratis or affordably which are prepared by uni’s professors and experts. Therefore, learners can not only access to instructive knowledge in their fields but also adapt to other disciplines. Meanwhile, physical learning often requires people to pay certain fees and studying data is occasionally finite. For instance, in Vietnam, courses related to digital transition are not populous in almost universities. As a consequence, struggles for students can be caused by it as they cannot be inaccessible if they are living in the Southern area, while these courses are established in the North. Meanwhile, digital transition courses are available in online foundations, they can stay at home, pay a small bill, and study.
To sum up, virtual learning is more and more predominant than in-person learning in the digital age. My point of view approves of this opinion due to its versatility, convenience, and course diversity supported by it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-27 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
- Nowadays celebrities earn money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it positive or negative development 78
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glomour and weath than for their achievemnets and this sets a bad example to young people To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Discuss the issues surrounding the lack of funding for schools in low income areas What solutions can be proposed to address this 89
- Lack of fresh water is becoming a global issue of increasing importance What problems does the shortage of fresh water cause What measures could be taken to overcome these problems 89
- Some people say that young people should be encouraged to leave home when they become adults while others claim it is better if they remain with their family Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54807692308 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04445847397 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580128205128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3269414246 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.823529412 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228512458697 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706853349817 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581156723033 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152415607456 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406393547325 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54807692308 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04445847397 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580128205128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3269414246 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.823529412 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228512458697 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706853349817 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581156723033 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152415607456 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406393547325 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.