Some children spend hours everyday on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive and negative development

Essay topics:

Some children spend hours everyday on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive and negative development?

In today’s world, the evidence of children spending more schedules on smartphones is a debatable issue. In this essay below, I will mention the reason causing this situation as well as the positive and negative aspects of it.
This phenomenon can be caused when they were a kid. For example, their parent would open funny cartoons on YouTube when they were eating which leads to generate a new habit for them. As a result, it is absolutely difficult for their parents to present when they grow up because if there are any early controlled solutions, these children will be considered this habit as normal and it contagiously happens in their daily life.
It is argued that this situation can be considered as both advantageous and negative effects on children. It is obviously true that it is the easiest cheating and abusing objects of online delinquents when they access the internet without their parent’s guarantees and suggestions. This is because they do not have sufficient experience to recognize right from wrong and always act instinctively. Therefore, it is extremely adverse for them when they utilize smartphones early. However, if their parent educates them on how to use this technology accurately, it can be preeminent development for adolescents. Accessing to latest information means that they can not only assimilate more knowledge in their real life but also broaden their mind and outlook at their home without wasting time going outside. As a consequence, spending a space of time on smartphones can pose both disadvantageous and beneficial impacts on children.
In conclusion, utilizing smartphones early can be beginning as a child which might lead to negative influences. However, if this technology is applied effectively, it can create positive consequences for young generations.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-13 thaokim2003 73 view
Essays by user thaokim2003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
... development for adolescents. Accessing to latest information means that they can not onl...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28027681661 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02786158635 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.51908759 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261832893954 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993619643115 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501935631743 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176183381885 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599922795385 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.