Numerous people are of the opinion that the problem of domestic waste recycling isn't enough. This needs another effective solution like requiring a policy. I concur with this viewpoint, which is clarified and complemented in my essay.
First of all, we need to comprehend the reasons why we reuse. Due to the fact that it's one of the effective approachs which both of preserving the environment and economizing. Therefore, we demand a new law which support thesse issues, Creating a new law can generate motivation in order to incentive for people impliment that. Thanks to it, individuals not only recognise thier responsibility but also implement seriously. Take German for example, its citizens have obeyed these regulations of its government, leading to it has become one of the highest reusing rate countries in the world. The more people reprocess, the more friendly environment is.
Nevertheless, making a new regulation isn't sufficient, public need to poccess a good awareness and education. If many people don't grasp utterly benfits of processing, they may feel it unneccesary. So, some basic knowledge about it are crucial so as to execute this policy. Hence, schools, community programs, social medias play a vital role in raising khowledge and impacting on attitudes towards reusing. The more knowledge they have, the better process is.
In conclusion, legal policies, awareness and education have an impact on reprocessing household wastes.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes Suggest some solutions 61
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 61
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ctive solution like requiring a policy. I concur with this viewpoint, which is cl...
^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...me basic knowledge about it are crucial so as to execute this policy. Hence, schools, co...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36244541485 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96199299297 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.694323144105 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0282034362 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8666666667 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2666666667 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19548458718 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562112186677 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641777276843 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975443129708 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528796754551 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.