Numerous people are of the opinion that the problem of domestic waste recycling isn't enough. This needs another effective solution like requiring a policy. I concur with this viewpoint, which is clarified and complemented in my essay.
First of all, we need to comprehend the reasons why we reuse. Due to the fact that it's one of the effective approachs which both of preserving the environment and economizing. Therefore, we demand a new law which support thesse issues, Creating a new law can generate motivation in order to incentive for people impliment that. Thanks to it, individuals not only recognise their responsibility but also implement seriously. Take German for example, its citizens have obeyed these regulations of its government, leading to it has become one of the highest reusing rate countries in the world, The more people process, the more friendly environment is.
Nevertheless,making a new regulation isn't sufficient, public need to poccess a good awareness and education. If many people don't grasp utterly benfits of processing, they may feel it unneccesary and they don’t do that cursory resulting in the process isn’t efficient. So, some basic knowledge about it are crucial so as to execute this policy. Hence, schools, community programs, social medias play a vital role in raising khowledge and impacting on attitudes towards reusing. Ny doing so, they recognize the important of reusing dometics waste.The more knowledge they have, the better process is.
In conclusion, legal policies, awareness and education have an impact on reprocessing household wastes.
- Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 87
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The bar graph shows a comparison of the figures for tropical deforestation for the year 1990 and 2000 The pie chart indicates the causes of tropical deforestation during the period from 2000 to 2005 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ctive solution like requiring a policy. I concur with this viewpoint, which is cl...
^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e friendly environment is. Nevertheless,making a new regulation isnt sufficient,...
^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...me basic knowledge about it are crucial so as to execute this policy. Hence, schools, co...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01472652159 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0007119068 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197402890619 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563983507717 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640735190418 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991924579137 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529419972918 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.