The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graphs illustrate usage levels of three distinctive types of electrical devices that a family used and the amount of time that they spent to accomplish housework per week in the same period, which is from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, the rate of using electrical appliances increased extremely while the time for housework was reduced by years. Another noticeable point is that the usage of washing machines saw a fluctuation, which is different from two others.
Regarding the information of the popularity of electrical devices, in the first year of the examined era, refrigerators accounted for just 1 or 2% while vacuum cleaners made up 30%. Then both of them witnessed a dramatic climb to 90% and 70% in 1960 respectively, before finally growing to 100% in the last year of the period. However, washing machines didn’t increase constantly through nearly three decades like two others, this item climbed from 40% in the first year to 80% in 1960. After that, the rate of washing machines slightly decreased to hit the lowest point off, at more than 60% after 20 years, and then significantly grew to the north of 70% in the final year.
Turning into the diagram that shows the number of hours spent for housework by people. This number started at 50 hours in the initial year, but then considerably declined to 20 hours, before finally falling to 10% in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the percentages of men and women aged 60 64 in employment in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison wh 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows the percentages of Australian export with four countries The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 You should write at least 150 words 84
- The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: VACUUM_CLEANER_HOOVER[1]
Message: This expression is common for American English. Did you mean 'hoover'?
Suggestion: hoover
...rators accounted for just 1 or 2% while vacuum cleaners made up 30%. Then both of them witnesse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87659574468 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62652141773 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604255319149 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8996449497 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995932197005 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430341941647 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489715446567 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715776380833 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401127640265 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.