The bar chart illustrate the food bought in supermarkets and good bought in supermarkets in three countries including: European-France- Germany and England.
The bar chart give information about the rate of food that people often bought in supermarket in specific country from 1998 to 2008.
Overall,it can be seen that the percentage of food bought in country one was highest but the good bought in country three was lowest. However, we can see clearly if we look at the specific decline.
Look at the first bar chart about the food bought in supermarkets. In country two, the percentage of food was highest among three country about 30%. However, in country one and three has the lowest rate ( 9% and 5%). Meanwhile, this percentage has the significantly highest in country one and two in 2008 ( 40% and 30%). Country three was still lowest about 10%.
Look at the second bar chart about the good bought in supermarkets in the first year is 1998. In country two, the rate of food product in supermarkets about 40% but in country one just had 11%, country three about 1%. In the last year is 2008, country one and two don’t have many different ( 60% and 50%). Finally, country three just had 10%. So, it can be seen that country have many food and good product is France and Germany.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- Pollution and environment damage result from developing and making the country richer To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The table chart show the population of New Zealand between 2011 and 2012 67
- Some people think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problem Give your option 73
- The map below compared 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 61
- The map below show how the industrial area will change into a housing area in the future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ific country from 1998 to 2008. Overall,it can be seen that the percentage of fo...
^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountry one and three has the lowest rate 9% and 5%. Meanwhile, this percentage ha...
^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y highest in country one and two in 2008 40% and 30%. Country three was still low...
^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...is 2008, country one and two don’t have many different 60% and 50%. Finally, country three ju...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry one and two don’t have many different 60% and 50%. Finally, country three just...
^^
Line 4, column 378, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...%. So, it can be seen that country have many food and good product is France and Ger...
^^^^
Line 4, column 378, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun food seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much food', 'a good deal of food'.
Suggestion: much food; a good deal of food
...%. So, it can be seen that country have many food and good product is France and Germany....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53201970443 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32860639149 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4039408867 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2294969394 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7692307692 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35564147292 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151830484274 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978794448659 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256387850703 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512056385885 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.86 8.06136585366 73% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.