The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.
The change in a culture is a continuous process. These changes in culture do not seem apparently but it changes; example is, the hair style which people used to admire is outdated now. The author here contends that most effective way to understand the contemporary culture is analyze the trends of its youth. Though, contention seems persuasive but in my opinion, not only youth is representative of the culture. Therefore I disagree with the author up to some extent.
The society consist people with all the ages. Observing only young generation doesn't give idea about whole society. What adults wear or how elders spend their day is also part of the culture. Analysis of only young generation will give incomplete outlook of the culture. This provincial outlook is not demonstrator of the culture of the whole society.
Moreover, the aspects which we can analyze from trends of the young generation are not the complete. The trends of youth such as their clothes, their hairdo, eating habits, music they listen, etc. only gives perfunctory view of the culture. These peripheral features only defines small fraction of the culture. To analyze the culture one has to look into details of how people speak, their eating habit, their history, their literature, their food, geography, music and many more parameters. Then only we can understand the culture of a particular society as whole.
However, Some of this parameters changes very rapidly. For instance, fashion, hair styles, type of music, etc. changes more frequently than their eating habits, literature, recreational activities, etc. And youth is more prone to adopt these rapidly changing trends. Some trends changes so rapidly that adults and elders are sometimes totally unknown to that. So one can argue that youth can effectively represent the current culture but excluding other than youth does not give whole picture.
Therefore, we can conclude that, only analyzing trends of youth, one can only have parochial outlook of the culture of the society. Adults and elders must be included to analysis to understand the complete picture.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 62
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 60
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are 70
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth. 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'analyzed'.
Suggestion: analyzed
... understand the contemporary culture is analyze the trends of its youth. Though, conten...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...youth is representative of the culture. Therefore I disagree with the author up to some e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r society as whole. However, Some of this parameters changes very rapidly. For in...
^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'change'.
Suggestion: change
...se rapidly changing trends. Some trends changes so rapidly that adults and elders are s...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'apparently', 'but', 'however', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'as to', 'for instance', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248730964467 0.238963963785 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.126903553299 0.154291517835 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0837563451777 0.0886310499679 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0812182741117 0.0506014161523 161% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0406091370558 0.0449626384858 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0939086294416 0.123526278965 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0177664974619 0.0379742944744 47% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.62605391596 2.82910677849 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0228426395939 0.0316879551592 72% => OK
Particles: 0.00253807106599 0.0014075125626 180% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0964467005076 0.0950106342287 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0203045685279 0.0245489744465 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0126903553299 0.0157978311181 80% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2118.0 2899.98275862 73% => OK
No of words: 340.0 478.390804598 71% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22941176471 6.0591788892 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.65681771538 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.394117647059 0.369966551584 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314705882353 0.285172536893 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.202941176471 0.207245337619 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.117647058824 0.136322040163 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62605391596 2.82910677849 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 234.298850575 75% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.492565540709 105% => OK
Word variations: 54.462475633 56.8184620615 96% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 21.1264367816 114% => OK
Sentence length: 14.1666666667 23.7468607788 60% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3572570398 62.0618507366 54% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.25 143.81877709 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 23.7468607788 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.541666666667 0.728815259664 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.87931034483 102% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.71264367816 52% => OK
Readability: 45.637254902 52.2641144681 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.44897959184 1.64547068916 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.573205788439 0.39480681544 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11001227684 0.11556216369 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0824486351268 0.0736162880345 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.502361702688 0.531340600358 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123849408751 0.15197228837 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192157570859 0.158818324754 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151739882638 0.0851127212816 178% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.351911033924 0.388921930462 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0925490006549 0.0677916285025 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.364787428494 0.28015025965 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135925819104 0.0610219844235 223% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.8591954023 37% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30459770115 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 19.0 4.96264367816 383% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 8.10632183908 37% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.93390804598 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 9.0 3.04597701149 295% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 15.0862068966 80% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 3.5 Out of 6