Many Lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculation, we cannot permit inoculation against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The author suggest that inoculation is not permitted against cow flu to be routinely administered. Also there are small possibility that person will die due to inoculation. There are many flaws in the argument.
Firstly author assume that by givining inoculation against cow flu routinely, many lives might saved. But not talk-about the other view that by taking inoculation routinely it harms the people or dangerous to humans life.
Other thing this statement is not give exact data or information about how many people might be saved and how many might be die during the inoculation routine.
In sum this this argument is not strong as it currently stands.The arguments need more information about the number of people who's life might be saved or might be die.
- Many Lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculation, we cannot permit 41
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to sped more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
The author suggest that inoculation is not permitted again...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...t cow flu to be routinely administered. Also there are small possibility that person...
^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...u routinely, many lives might saved. But not talk-about the other view that by ta...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
... how many people might be saved and how many might be die during the inoculation routine. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... die during the inoculation routine. In sum this this argument is not strong ...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
...ng the inoculation routine. In sum this this argument is not strong as it currently ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...nt is not strong as it currently stands.The arguments need more information about t...
^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
... information about the number of people whos life might be saved or might be die.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237037037037 0.25644967241 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.192592592593 0.15541462614 124% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103703703704 0.0836205057962 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0740740740741 0.0520304965353 142% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0148148148148 0.0272364105082 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118518518519 0.125424944231 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0666666666667 0.0416121511921 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71912463622 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0222222222222 0.026700313972 83% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0666666666667 0.113004496875 59% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0444444444444 0.0255425247493 174% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0148148148148 0.0127820249294 116% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 774.0 2731.13054187 28% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 127.0 446.07635468 28% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09448818898 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.35699682299 4.57801047555 73% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314960629921 0.378187486979 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.212598425197 0.287650121315 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181102362205 0.208842608468 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.157480314961 0.135150697306 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71912463622 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 207.018472906 37% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59842519685 0.469332199767 128% => OK
Word variations: 48.0839876241 52.1807786196 92% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 20.039408867 35% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 18.1428571429 23.2022227129 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4951377771 57.7814097925 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.571428571 141.986410481 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 23.2022227129 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.724660767414 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.58251231527 223% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 39.4026996625 51.9672348444 76% => OK
Elegance: 1.5 1.8405768891 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464066130125 0.441005458295 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.19348599762 0.135418324435 143% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.103993858348 0.0829849096947 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.716492742574 0.58762219726 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.197883129037 0.147661913831 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.238809995419 0.193483328276 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573446856906 0.0970749176394 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.303758277742 0.42659136922 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0651390486144 0.0774707102158 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295274159342 0.312017818177 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086867998663 0.0698173142475 124% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.33743842365 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.82512315271 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 6.46551724138 15% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 14.657635468 41% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.