Gone were the days when contagious disease once was prevalent around this world. It is no overly exaggration to give this credit to varities of inoculations. Despite there is a small possibility that a person may be die as a result of the inoculation, to throw the blame on the inoculation itself or even abolish it is doubtlessly a regressive approach.
The argument stated by the title somehow infers a logic which says, human being should be put as the primary position when conflicted with scientifically medical approach. Though it explains its reasons, the overwhelming benefits the inoculation brings is somehow ignored in this argument. International society long have been reached in consensus that inoculations is an effective weapon against cow flu, and countless statistics have proved that it has astounishing effect in preventing the cow flu from flooding among people in those poor countries.
The deeper reason why we cannot stop performing inoculations lies in the fact that it can help us better investigate the features of the disease. That's the true reason why we keep on funding on researches involving pathologies In other words, with further investigations and researches, we can improve the qualities of those inoculations, reduce the possibility that the side-effect it may bring to human bodies.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 58
- Many Lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculation, we cannot permit 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ment stated by the title somehow infers an logic which says, human being should be...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
...elp us better investigate the features? of the disease. Thats the true reason why ...
^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...vestigate the features? of the disease. Thats the true reason why we keep on funding ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions and researches, we can improve and the qualities of those inoculations, red...
^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...ations, reduce the possibility that the side-effect it may bring to human bodies.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'may', 'so', 'as a result', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244541484716 0.25644967241 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.17903930131 0.15541462614 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0786026200873 0.0836205057962 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0305676855895 0.0520304965353 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0524017467249 0.0272364105082 192% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.126637554585 0.125424944231 101% => OK
Participles: 0.061135371179 0.0416121511921 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.12041760859 2.79052419416 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0174672489083 0.026700313972 65% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.131004366812 0.113004496875 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0262008733624 0.0255425247493 103% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0218340611354 0.0127820249294 171% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1328.0 2731.13054187 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 212.0 446.07635468 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.2641509434 6.12365571057 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.57801047555 83% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.396226415094 0.378187486979 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287735849057 0.287650121315 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216981132075 0.208842608468 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.179245283019 0.135150697306 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12041760859 2.79052419416 112% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 207.018472906 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.669811320755 0.469332199767 143% => OK
Word variations: 74.2427374219 52.1807786196 142% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 20.039408867 45% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 23.5555555556 23.2022227129 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.4249635638 57.7814097925 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.555555556 141.986410481 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 23.2022227129 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.724660767414 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.14285714286 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 52.3291404612 51.9672348444 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.65 1.8405768891 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407282669108 0.441005458295 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125680171438 0.135418324435 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0349821071982 0.0829849096947 42% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.593932920642 0.58762219726 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153480846921 0.147661913831 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191158898534 0.193483328276 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797900624848 0.0970749176394 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.293727652069 0.42659136922 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0377179976975 0.0774707102158 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29005122584 0.312017818177 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531932528217 0.0698173142475 76% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 14.657635468 41% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.