Cot-Ten, a cotton production company, has recently faced profitability issues based on the use of
Chemical X in its manufacturing process. The main by-product produced when using Chemical X is
covered under stringent environmental regulations, making it very difficult and expensive to dispose of. A
similar processing product, Chemical Y, has recently been discovered, and can be used by Cot-Ten at a
minimal cost of switching. The CEO of Cot-Ten has declared that the company will increase profits by
switching to Chemical Y by the end of the month.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and
explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The CEO of the Cot-ten, a cotton producing company has decided to switch to Chemical Y from Chemical X in manufacturing process of cotton, as he believes that disposing Chemical X is expensive and changing over to Chemical Y will increase the profit by reducing this cost. The assumptions that are taken for the argument are not backed by evidence and leave many questions unanswered. The CEO has not mentioned if a detailed study on cost-benefit of switching to other chemical was done prior to the decision. Also, if Chemical Y is newly discovered there could be many health hazards associated with it that may not have been identified as of yet. Likewise many other points need to be clarified before assuming that shifting to a new chemical will be safe and profitable.
Switching to a new Chemical Y from Chemical X would be profitable only if the cost of disposing the chemical is majorly relevant to the total cost. It is nowhere checked for how much does the cost of disposing the chemical is in context of overall costs. If this expenditure is meagre then replacing the chemical would have no impact on overall profits. The CEO must also consider if the new chemical would be able to produce the same quality of cotton. If using Chemical Y leads production of poor quality cotton then the profits would decrease owing to less number of buyers than before.
It is also mentioned that Chemical Y is recently discovered and therefore it is very possible that it may have severe health and environmental hazards for which it may not have bee tested. If such a case arises the expenditure on remediation of such cases would definitely be far exceeding than the present case. The fact that Chemical Y is new could be the reason why it is not yet under the scanner for environmental damages. And the byproducts of the Chemical may be harmful in various indirect ways than Chemical X. The CEO must do a complete analysis of the fact and only then switch to new Chemical Y.
To sum, the CEO has made an argument based on assumptions that lack supporting evidence and lot of questions unanswered. Going ahead with the decision may lead a further decrease in profits or worse pose a health hazard to the people and the environment around.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-14 | Seema Modak | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | Parth12 | 43 | view |
| 2018-09-16 | A.I. | 66 | view |
| 2018-09-11 | A.I. | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | borahlohit05@gmail.com | 35 | view |
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively 50
- The fact that technology is outpacing the needs of those in cultures that can afford the technology creates cultures of excess consumerism 78
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 50
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- "During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-job acc 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ce and leave many questions unanswered. The CEO has not mentioned if a detailed stu...
^^^
Line 1, column 639, Rule ID: AS_OF_YET[1]
Message: Use simply 'yet' or 'as yet'.
Suggestion: yet; as yet
...th it that may not have been identified as of yet. Likewise many other points need to be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 650, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...may not have been identified as of yet. Likewise many other points need to be clarified ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...tal cost. It is nowhere checked for how much does the cost of disposing the chemical...
^^^^
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hemical is in context of overall costs. If this expenditure is meagre then replaci...
^^
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... If using Chemical Y leads production of poor quality cotton then the profits wou...
^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s for which it may not have bee tested. If such a case arises the expenditure on r...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'likewise', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234299516908 0.25644967241 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.195652173913 0.15541462614 126% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0942028985507 0.0836205057962 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0628019323671 0.0520304965353 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0193236714976 0.0272364105082 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128019323671 0.125424944231 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0797101449275 0.0416121511921 192% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.71499245219 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0338164251208 0.026700313972 127% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101449275362 0.113004496875 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0386473429952 0.0255425247493 151% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0144927536232 0.0127820249294 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2238.0 2731.13054187 82% => OK
No of words: 393.0 446.07635468 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69465648855 6.12365571057 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.57801047555 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.328244274809 0.378187486979 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274809160305 0.287650121315 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208651399491 0.208842608468 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0966921119593 0.135150697306 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71499245219 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 207.018472906 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468193384224 0.469332199767 100% => OK
Word variations: 49.9528576486 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1176470588 23.2022227129 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5663739796 57.7814097925 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.647058824 141.986410481 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 23.2022227129 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.411764705882 0.724660767414 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.58251231527 195% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 50.5985630894 51.9672348444 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.59130434783 1.8405768891 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343927312967 0.441005458295 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124737526722 0.135418324435 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.079780298311 0.0829849096947 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.574611345298 0.58762219726 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11556103972 0.147661913831 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155198694769 0.193483328276 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713647528332 0.0970749176394 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.45422210503 0.42659136922 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10880155618 0.0774707102158 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246607394446 0.312017818177 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031945923452 0.0698173142475 46% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 5.36822660099 112% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.