"For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the symphony's concerts-in-the-park series doubled. The symphony has also announced an increase in ticket prices for next year. Given such developments, some city commissioners argue that the symphony can now be fully self-supporting, and they recommend that funding for the symphony be eliminated from next year's budget."
The argument mentions the case of Grandview Symphony, which has seen a 200 percent increase in the attendance last year. And based on which it is planned that the ticket prices be increased and budget for the Symphony be removed from the city’s annual budget. At first the arguments seems quite logical. However, the assumptions do not seem to support the argument in its entirety. Some questions need to be answered before any conclusion can be drawn from them.
To begin with, the author mention is that there was a 200 percent increase in the Symphony’s attendance the previous years. This has been taken as a basis to assume that there is an increased popularity for the Symphony amongst the citizens of city. It may indeed be the case as more attendance should mean more interest in the event. However, there is a possibility that there were external factors, which might have lead to this sudden spike in the attendance. Had there been a gradual increase in attendance there would be little doubt in assuming that the people of Grandview city have started to like the symphony, which is not the case here. Therefore, the question that must be answered must be why is there a sudden increase in the attendance? Is it a one-time phenomenon that occurred due to some factor other than the Symphony itself? If the answer were to be in affirmative this would lead to crisis situation where the Symphony would be unable to meet its expenses due to flawed calculation of number of audience.
In addition to that, it is also proposed to increase the ticket price of the Symphony. This decision is based on that the audience does not mind paying extra amount. Even if we assume that the Symphony is highly popular amongst the people there is no evidence that suggests that audience would accept and increase in the ticket price. If, on the contrary, an increase in the ticket prices leads to a situation where people find it too expensive and do not attend the symphony. The author must therefore question would people be okay with an increase in ticket price? And if yes, then up to what extent? This would help in understanding if there is any correlation between ticket price and attendance for the Symphony.
Furthermore, the commissioners of the city based on the assumptions of increase in popularity and plan of increasing the ticket price have commented that the Symphony can be self-sufficient and that there is no need for any separate budget for it. The conclusion drawn is absurd as it is based on assumptions that are not grounded with supporting evidences. Considering all assumptions to be true, that is more people turn up and that too they are willing to pay higher ticket prices, it must be asked would the revenue from these ticket sales would be enough to meet the costs of the Symphony? If not, then in that case any decision to cut the budget would lead to financial crisis for the conduct of Symphony.
To summarize, it may very well be possible that the Grandview Symphony has stuck chord with the people of city. However, the argument presented and conclusion arrived is based on assumptions, which are not supported by evidence. If the author is able to provide answer to the mentioned questions, it can provide the necessary support to arrive at any concrete conclusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-01 | Sai sushma | 63 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | inessad | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | ireth7 | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | SOUMEDHIK | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | zickzion123 | 50 | view |
- "Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned with leading healthy lives. We should therefore build one of our new stores in Plainsville, which clearly has many such residents. Plainsvi 70
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively 50
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 70
- Cot-Ten, a cotton production company, has recently faced profitability issues based on the use ofChemical X in its manufacturing process. The main by-product produced when using Chemical X iscovered under stringent environmental regulations, making it ver 79
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 852, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... factor other than the Symphony itself? If the answer were to be in affirmative th...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'in addition', 'on the contrary', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224 0.25644967241 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.184 0.15541462614 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.064 0.0836205057962 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0384 0.0520304965353 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0256 0.0272364105082 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.1248 0.125424944231 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0512 0.0416121511921 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67099479254 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0384 0.026700313972 144% => OK
Particles: 0.0016 0.001811407834 88% => OK
Determiners: 0.1312 0.113004496875 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.032 0.0255425247493 125% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0208 0.0127820249294 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3318.0 2731.13054187 121% => OK
No of words: 571.0 446.07635468 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81085814361 6.12365571057 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.57801047555 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.330998248687 0.378187486979 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.239929947461 0.287650121315 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197898423818 0.208842608468 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112084063047 0.135150697306 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67099479254 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 207.018472906 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404553415061 0.469332199767 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.6232359024 52.1807786196 91% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.039408867 135% => OK
Sentence length: 21.1481481481 23.2022227129 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8346781371 57.7814097925 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 141.986410481 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1481481481 23.2022227129 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.481481481481 0.724660767414 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 45.1411428942 51.9672348444 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.61290322581 1.8405768891 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535793881319 0.441005458295 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120550171358 0.135418324435 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0827680330087 0.0829849096947 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.557080672097 0.58762219726 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142309529827 0.147661913831 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245063476037 0.193483328276 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122428999748 0.0970749176394 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.602077693585 0.42659136922 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.048866474276 0.0774707102158 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.429446905934 0.312017818177 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697941594837 0.0698173142475 100% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.33743842365 192% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 6.46551724138 232% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 25.0 14.657635468 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.