Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The field of arts requires the funding government funding in order to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Firstly, allowing the government to fund the different area of arts advocates in recognizing the less known artists in various field of arts. Secondly,the availability of arts to the other people also helps inspire and develop interest to the young generation of artists. Also, the artists from various other countries and places would be curious to know the various works of other artists, leading to increased tourism. On the contrary, even though the government would be interested to funding the arts , biases and prejudices might threaten the integrity of the artists and their work.
Firstly, in order to recognize the less known artists and their contribution to the field of arts, the funding from government would help in bringing their work into light. Equal opportunity might be given to artists from various fields-painting,music, sculptures, literature and various other fields, so that their talent and skill can be recognized by other people.
Secondly, Young minds would be inspired by the work of other artists . This could also lead to innovative ideas and discoveries by the future generation artists. Which would give an opportunity for the government to further fund these artists and their talents.
Thirdly, by funding various artists and displaying their work, people from various other places would be interested and curious to know more about the other artists and their work. Leading to an increased revenue and income to the country or city portraying the artists work. This could also motivate the artists and others to contribute to the field of arts.
On the contrary, although the artists benefit from government funds, prejudices and biases inside the government could threaten artists.This could lead to giving opportunity only to the well-known artists and neglecting the less-known works of other artists, in-turn could affect the integrity of the artists and their work.
In conclusion, there is more to be benefited from funding has a better opportunity to help artists express their work ensuring that the arts can flourish and be available to all people, than restraining from funding the arts and artists.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 25
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situ 50
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Firstly, allowing the government to fund the different area of arts advocates in ...
^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...tists in various field of arts. Secondly,the availability of arts to the other peopl...
^^^^
Line 1, column 642, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... would be interested to funding the arts , biases and prejudices might threaten th...
^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , music
... to artists from various fields-painting,music, sculptures, literature and various ot...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ists from various fields-painting,music, sculptures, literature and various other...
^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, Young minds would be inspired by the work of other artists . This could also ...
^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e inspired by the work of other artists . This could also lead to innovative idea...
^^
Line 6, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng their work, people from various other places would be interested and curious t...
^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...e the government could threaten artists.This could lead to giving opportunity only ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould threaten artists.This could lead to giving opportunity only to the well-know...
^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In conclusion, there is more to be benefited from funding has a better oppo...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'in conclusion', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258706467662 0.240241500013 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.139303482587 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0995024875622 0.0880659088768 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0273631840796 0.0497285424764 55% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0223880597015 0.0444667217837 50% => OK
Prepositions: 0.101990049751 0.12292977631 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0497512437811 0.0406280797675 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78780019357 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0572139303483 0.030933414821 185% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.111940298507 0.0997080785238 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0398009950249 0.0249443105267 160% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0148568991511 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2301.0 2732.02544248 84% => OK
No of words: 367.0 452.878318584 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.26975476839 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367847411444 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318801089918 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196185286104 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136239782016 0.132149295362 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78780019357 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 219.290929204 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.392370572207 0.48968727796 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.1561131952 55.4138127331 72% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 24.4666666667 23.380412469 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0301126829 59.4972553346 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.4 141.124799967 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 23.380412469 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.866666666667 0.674092028746 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.21349557522 211% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 56.3467756585 51.4728631049 109% => OK
Elegance: 2.17105263158 1.64882698954 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552209241336 0.391690518653 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.198354814632 0.123202303941 161% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0935059470547 0.077325440228 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.725987693061 0.547984918172 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123909086391 0.149214159877 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.314908111676 0.161403998019 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171076400054 0.0892212321368 192% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.484829470944 0.385218514788 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.100376299523 0.0692045440612 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.384006588319 0.275328986314 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135486323309 0.0653680567796 207% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.